Do you hate one of your parents that at one time you loved? Has your family been broken apart by divorce?
I am writing this post for those children from divorced families who hate one of their parents. If at one time you loved that now hated parent—when you were all once a family—but now, after the divorce or separation, you now hate that parent, this is written in the hope that I may help you understand why.
First, most people know that divorce is one of the most devastating events a family can pass through. There is no such thing as a “good divorce” when there are children involved, especially young children. If you had one of your limbs amputated because of an injury or disease, you would never say, “You know, having my leg amputated was not such a bad thing. I won’t miss it in the least.” The same goes for a family with children: divorce causes amputations of metaphorical limbs that will always have devastating consequences.
Second, certain kind of divorces are worse than others. Though divorce is always a horrific event to pass through (and again, I’m referring to divorce with children involved), if the parents splitting apart understand the devastation this will bring to their children and are committed to doing whatever is necessary to soften the blow for them, these innocents will fare better than those parents who openly hate each other and make the divorce process more like open warfare between hostile belligerents.
“High conflict divorces” are the most damaging ones for children. These share common characteristics: regular battles in divorce court where the parents fight over money, child support, custody, choice of schools, what kind of faith the children will be raised in, what state the parents will live in, etc. If a family law judge has become the arbiter of most of your pre and post divorce family issues, know for certain you are in a “high conflict divorce” which wrecks unbelievable emotional, physical and psychological damage to your children which will affect them for the rest of their lives.
A high conflict divorce is a perfect breeding ground for the cultivation of hatred and bitterness for innocent, impressionable children who, for the most part, love both their mom and dad and want more than anything in the world for them to stay together and to have their family remain intact and healthy. And for those parents who use the court system to harm their spouse and take revenge on them, the children will be harmed right along with them. “Revenge,” as the old saying goes, “is a dish best served cold.”
If you are a child from such a divorce, and you find yourself hating the very parent you once loved, I urge you, for the sake of your own health and happiness, to realize that something terribly wrong has occurred in your heart and that you need to discover the tools necessary to bring meaning and healing to this destructive set of unhealthy and dangerous emotions.
Let me emphatically point out that you are not to be blamed for these destructive emotions. In fact, you have been manipulated—brainwashed—by one of your parents to have these feelings toward the very parent you once loved and cherished. Understanding this phenomena is your first step toward unwrapping the troubling maze that has twisted your innocent mind into harboring these dangerous and unhealthy feelings toward a once loved parent.
Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) or simply, Parental Alienation, is the name for this subtle form of unethical and abusive form of brainwashing that is often birthed out of high conflict divorces. Here is a helpful, introductory article to get you started, titled, “Parental Alienation and its Repair,” by Mollie S. Castelloe, PhD.
My main interest in this lawsuit stems from serious allegations made against one of the abortion doctors referred in the “Verified Complaint” as “Dr. X.” Another doctor described in the complaint, referred to as “Dr. Y,” was also alleged to have committed serious infractions. (The allegations against Dr. X are found beginning on page 4 of the Verified Complaint, paragraphs 24 through 33.)
Neither of these abortionists are identified by their legal names. In fact, none of the articles written by various news outlets that I read referred to either of these individuals by their names, casting a pall of secrecy over these two abortionists and granting them a buffer of protection from public scrutiny and possible censure by keeping their true identities from the public eye.
My interest in this case is personal; for the last five years, I have stood on the sidewalks outside of Tucson’s only abortion clinic, Tucson Women’s Center (TWC), with other pro-life Christians in our continual attempts to offer help to abortion minded women seeking to terminate their pregnancies. The abortionist who ran this particular clinic is William H. Richardson.
In July of 2018, Richardson closed TWC and merged with Planned Parenthood (PP), moving his operations to the PP facility located literally across the street in the same medical plaza, located at 2255 N. Wyatt Dr.
For the past several months, I was hearing about the story of Mayra Rodriquez and what was occurring with her problems with PP in Phoenix. Like so many other stories concerning PP and their abuses, Mayra’s story added to the constant drumbeat of shocking news coming out of PP and did not particularly stand out and arrest my attention…until a week or so ago.
I received an email from a fellow Christian who regularly ministers on the same sidewalks outside of Tucson’s PP as I do. During our subsequent discussions, this sidewalk counselor informed me that “Dr. X” was positively identified as Richardson.
How was this identification confirmed? Mayra Rodriquez reached out to Abby Johnson, another former PP clinic director who became a whistleblower. Johnson’s story generated coast to coast attention to the problems with the abortion giant and she became a national spokeswoman for the pro-life movement. The 2019 movie “Unplanned” chronicles Johnson’s story.
Rodriguez contacted Johnson due, in part, because of Johnson’s organization, “And Then There Were None,” which states on its website: “And Then There Were None (ATTWN) is a registered nonprofit organization that exists to help abortion clinic workers leave the abortion industry…”
A video collaboration between Rodriquez and ATTWN resulted in at least two videos (here and here) which told Rodriquez’s story of why she was fired from PP. It was in the second video where she identifies “Dr. X” as Richardson:
The above video is almost 40 minutes long (note: the audio portion when Myra speaks is poor—please listen with quality headphones for the best listening experience). To save time, I will include the relevant timestamps below for those who might not have the time to listen to the full video:
Beginning at timestamp 4:40 and continuing through 5:46, a portion from the paperwork generated because of the lawsuit lays the foundation for the claims against Richardson as being the doctor who was receiving the greatest amount of “incidents,” though he was not the abortionist responsible for performing the greatest amount of abortions.
Beginning at timestamp 30:42, Mayra lays further foundation for the allegation that Richardson, being number two in the amount of abortions performed, was nonetheless responsible for nearly 50% of all statewide complications.
The testimony from Mayra, beginning at 30:42 and continuing through 33:43, contains among the most serious allegations leveled against Richardson. For example, at timestamp 32:01 through 32:18, the narrator comments that Mayra was speaking out against Richardson “…because the whole premise of you being fired as a whistleblower is the fact that you spoke up against Dr. Richardson…right? Like you said, this is not ok, all of the complications, all of the complaints…”
What is clear is that Dr. X is referring to William Richardson. Whenever the reader observes the words “Dr. X” in the Verified Complaint, they can substitute “Dr. William Richardson” and be accurate in that replacement.
I wish to point out that, at this point in my investigation on this evolving story, I am unaware that Richardson has been indicted or officially charged for any of the crimes alleged against him in the Verified Complaint. Until such allegations transform into a criminal investigation where he is found guilty after a jury trial, or if he would admit guilt as part of an inevitable plea agreement if charges are filed against him, he must be seen as “innocent until proven guilty.”
This information is troubling on multiple levels. First, why was Richardson not immediately fired from his position by PP when these allegations were made public? Why was he not fired long before these public revelations became known if indeed, as Rodriquez claims, such allegations had been well known to PP for years? (See paragraph 29.) Since PP constantly trumpets their concern for the health and wellbeing of their female patients, why would they allow this possibly rogue physician to continue to harm vulnerable women?
Second, Richardson primarily practices his grisly abortion trade in Tucson, AZ. Upon information and belief, he travels to Phoenix and Flagstaff performing abortions due to a shortage of abortionists available at these clinics. His main geographical area for performing abortions is at the PP in Tucson, located in a private medical plaza known as “Tucson Medical Center.” This sprawling medical complex is located due south of the hospital that shares the same name: Tucson Medical Center (TMC), a long established hospital in Tucson that carries an excellent reputation as being one of the best hospitals in Arizona.
Tucson Medical Center, an Arizona non-profit, owns the specific parcel of real property where the PP building is situated and out of which Richardson performs abortions. This PP building is surrounded by many other medical buildings staffed and run by medical professionals: urologists, dentists, optometrists, psychiatrists, wound doctors, etc.
Clearly, a hospital with an excellent reputation such as what TMC currently enjoys would not allow a physician like Richardson to practice amongst other doctors not burdened by such serious allegations. But Richardson’s presence in that community has always been an enigma to me. Why would a hospital like TMC allow an abortion doctor to practice there in the first place?
Are these serious allegations indeed fact? Is Richardson guilty of the acts and omissions Mayra Rodriguez claims in her lawsuit? Evidently, the jury hearing, examining, and weighing the evidence presented to them appears to believe that he is guilty as charged and awarded her an astonishing $3 million dollar judgment as part of their belief in his guilt, as well as the guilt of PP in wrongfully terminating her.
If Richardson is guilty of these allegations, one cannot dance around the conclusion: he is a criminal, rogue abortionist who should have his medical license immediately revoked and suffer the consequences of such crimes.
And if Planned Parenthood is guilty of knowing about these crimes for years as Rodriguez alleges they have, and if Richardson’s actions are proven to be criminal in nature, PP’s cover-up is criminal as well and they should also be held responsible for such an unconscionable coverup that allowed this abortionist to continue harming women.
In the Verified Complaint listed above, paragraph 48, page 8 speaks of Richardson’s “…conduct and the resulting substantial risk to the health, safety and welfare of PPA patients and future patients…” But these risks to patients were never addressed or properly investigated due to a close personal relationship Ms. Ibarra, Center Manager for PPA, maintained with Richardson: it “was impossible, as a practical matter, to objectively raise the concerns with Ms. Ibarra as to Dr. X and the substantial risk he presented to patient safety, health, and welfare because of their longstanding relationship” (paragraph 49, page 9, lines 9-11).
The serious allegations against Richardson are again mentioned on page 12, paragraph 73.
Additional video from Mayra Rodriguez detailing further malpractice of Richardson
Beginning at timestamp 5:09 and continuing through 9:21 in the above video, Mayra goes into detail concerning one of the PP doctors with whom she had “a few discrepancies.” (5:07) This unnamed doctor is William Richardson.
Around the beginning of August or September of 2017, Richardson performed a second trimester abortion on a woman who was thirteen weeks pregnant (5:41). One of the staff members in the operating room with both Richardson and the patient was tasked with the grisly procedure of counting the body parts of the dismembered fetus in order to insure all the detached pieces of the baby were completely removed from the mother’s womb.
At this stage in the unborn babies development, bones and cartilage are developing, requiring the abortionist to perform what is known as a “D&C” (Dilation and Curettage) abortion. This is a grisly procedure which includes the use of a sharp, looped shaped instrument—a curettage—used to shear and scrape the body parts from off the fetus and away from the uterine wall. Since the baby is dismembered, his or her’s small body parts (euphemistically referred to by Mayra as POC’s [Products of Conception]) must be counted and “itemized” to insure no pieces are left behind. Failure to do so would mean human remains are left in the patient, which, as they decompose, can result in the woman developing dangerous and potentially life-threatening infections.
This itemizing of the baby’s body parts alerted the staff worker that Richardson failed to complete the abortion; he left behind pieces of this dismembered fetus inside the patient (6:01 through 6:27), requiring him to return to the patient and complete the operation (6:33 through 6:42).
This incident can also be found on page 6 of the aforementioned “Verified Complaint,” paragraph 31.
Mayra was evidently outraged at this (7:12) and suggested that this incident be brought up to the “Federation” (the nationwide “Planned Parenthood Federation of America” as opposed to the local, state level “Planned Parenthood of Arizona.”) She was told to “not worry about it” (7:31) and the end result was that nothing was done (7:37).
Richardson’s and PP’s prior problems
On June 27th in 2002, an “Amended Complaint” was filed against Richardson and PP in the Superior Court of Maricopa County in Phoenix alleging negligence, assault, and battery of a then 14-year-old female minor (see paragraph 15, page 4), identified in the lawsuit as “Jane Doe.”
The allegations directed toward Richardson and PP are both serious and shocking. In brief, this case revolves around a 23-year-old man, Shawn M. Stevens (see paragraph 14), who was the son of foster parents “retained and hired” by the State of Arizona as “foster parents for the minor child, Jane Doe” (see paragraph 5).
While in the custody and control of these foster parents, their son, Shawn, molested and impregnated Jane Doe. He took her to PP on November 10, 1998 for an abortion (paragraph 14).
According to the allegations in the Complaint, PP knew Jane Doe was a minor on this date and failed to alert the authorities (paragraph’s 15-17) of this fact and also failed to inform the foster parents they performed an abortion on her. Richardson performed the abortion.
Paragraph 16 from the Amended Complaint reads:
“Because of Planned Parenthood’s failure to report the abortion of November 10, 1998, Jane Doe was subjected to continued child molestation and sexual exploitation up and until Jane Doe presented herself for a second abortion on May 6, 1999. Only after the second abortion did Planned Parenthood notify authorities on May 11, 1999. Shawn M. Stevens also brought Jane Doe to Planned Parenthood on May 6, 1999.”
Paragraph 17, on page 4, alleges “grossly negligent” behavior on the part of PP (line 20) for their “…failure to notify the proper authorities of the abortion of Jane Doe…,” causing “Jane Doe to be subject to repeated child molestation and sexual exploitation as the hands of an adult for an additional period of approximately six (6) months. Had Planned Parenthood properly reported the incident to authorities, the perpetrator of the child molestation and sexual exploitation would have been apprehended by authorities and Jane Doe would not have had to go through a second abortion procedure…”
The alleged crimes of Dr. Richardson concerning this minor child are found on page 11 of the Verified Complaint as Count IX, “Negligence—Dr. Richardson.” Like the allegations against PP, Richardson is accused of knowing the underage status of Jane Doe (paragraph 43) and failing to inform the foster parents that he was planning on performing, or had already performed, an abortion on this 14-year-old victim of sexual molestation and exploitation.
Paragraph 45, found on page 12, alleges additional shocking allegations of Richardson’s gross negligence: the victim suffered “physical pain, humiliation, emotional distress, permanent psychological damages, and potential physical damages.”
There is probably no better way to easily reach thousands of JW’s than going to one of their summer conventions with the expressed purpose of “Witnessing to the Witnesses.”
Signs and banners:
One of the best methods is holding up large, bold-lettered, short and easily read signs and banners with a pithy message that might say, “Read the Bible, not the Watchtower.” This method transformed the lives of author David A. Reed and his wife, as highlighted in two of my videos.
A necessary and vital tip on making signs or having them made for you by a local sign shop: Less is more. In other words, less words is far better than many words. The less words on a sign, the better you are able to capture the attention of your audience. Don’t make the amateur mistake of putting an entire paragraph on a sign; these are too hard to be easily and quickly read. You need short and powerful messages.
Call around for the best prices at your local sign shops. For one or two signs, red or black vinyl lettering on a white background is best. The sign material is made out of plastic, called “Corex.” A good sized sign is 3′ x 2′. Such a sign will probably run you anywhere between $20 and $30. If you know someone in your church who has a vinyl cutter and can make the signs for cost, that would be even better.
I had what proved to be one of the most effective ideas for outreach at these JW summer conventions: advertising a favorite ex-JW website. In my case, the first website I advertised was “towerwatch.com”. My evangelism partner, Mike, made me a small, handheld banner with “towerwatch.com” in bold, easily read letters on his home printer; when stretched out, it measured about four feet in length. When not in use or being transported, we rolled it up like a scroll, very easy to carry or put in my backpack. A picture is below:
During the lunch break, as thousands of JW’s would stream out the doors and eat their lunches outside, I slowly and continually walk around with this banner stretched between both of my hands, in plain view of the JW’s.
I developed what I hope is a humorous and light-hearted script as I walk around, saying something like this: “I want to wish all of you Jehovah’s Witnesses a happy birthday by giving you a gift, a gift of knowledge, found here on this banner I’m carrying which reads, “towerwatch.com”. It’s a great website that has all kinds of helpful information on Jehovah’s Witnesses that you won’t get at your weekly Kingdom Hall meetings.
“It’s simple to remember this website: towerwatch.com. It’s just like ‘watchtower’ but you split ‘watchtower’ in half and put the word ‘tower’ in front of ‘watch’ and you have the website, ‘towerwatch.com’.
“But like any gift, you have to ‘open’ the present before it can do you any good. So before you can enjoy this gift of knowledge, you have to log onto the internet and type in “towerwatch.com”.”
I walk all around the area where the JW’s are sitting or standing, endlessly repeating the same thing. Why do I do this? Because by the end of their lunch break, they will have heard “towerwatch.com” so many times that it will be burned into their memories and perhaps they will even dream about it at night while they are sleeping.
I repeat this website endlessly on purpose, knowing that the most effective advertising is that which is seen by people over and over again. The more times a person watches the same commercial on t.v. or hears the same ad on radio, the more apt he is to remember the product or service being advertised. I employ the same tried and proven philosophy at the conventions.
But the “proof is in the pudding” and the only true sign that this unorthodox method is effective is whether or not people are actually logging on to the towerwatch.com website. I’m happy to report that people do log onto this website.
How I know this is because I contacted the man who started and runs towerwatch.com; his name is Cal Lehman. I explained to Cal what I was doing, and had done, at the summer conventions in Tucson with the small “towerwatch.com” banner, asking him to check his web traffic on and around those days. Here is what he wrote:
July 5, 2011
Hi Roy, Thanks for the email and the story, I will respond to your email soon I promise. I have a lot on my plate right now 🙂 Thank you so much for displaying the TowerWatch.com sign at the convention sites. Yes there was a sharp increase …in visitors to the TowerWatch website starting around June 13 and lasting the remainder of the month. What I found very interesting was that there were very strong spikes on each of the last three Mondays in June! Thanks again for helping to get the word out.
To say the least, I was thrilled with this news! This meant this idea was effective in at least one way: traffic being driven to Cal’s website through the simple act of advertising it during the lunch hours at the summer conventions, with perhaps thousands of seeds being planted in the hearts of JW’s were some of them will surely bear fruit unto salvation.
This reminds me of that portion in David A. Reed’s book mentioned in my one of my video’s when David described how he and his wife Penni eventually accepted the Lord and left the org:
“Like a stranger on a mountaintop viewing a peaceful valley below, who, as he turns to leave, casually tosses a pebble into the void, and who continues on his way, unaware that the pebble dislodged two other pebbles, which unbalanced a small stone, which in turn set other stones in motion until a major avalanche rumbled down the mountainside, forever altering the valley scene he viewed—just such a stranger set in motion a series of events that eventually brought turmoil to Penni and me, and permanently changed our lives.”
“The initial pebble was a picket sign carried by one of five individuals walking in a small circle on the sidewalk outside the Providence, Rhode Island, Civic Center in July 1977…”
I can only hope that, in eternity, the Lord will reveal to me what wonderful, eternal miracles happened to some of these JW’s who, out of curiosity by seeing and hearing me walk around the convention they attended years ago, logged onto Cal’s website and eventually set off a chain of events that led to their salvation. Praise the Lord!
Here is the 1914 sign in action:
Here is the video I made years ago showing how a friend of mine made the banner that changed the life and eternity of David and Penni Wood:
Preaching at the conventions are another excellent way to get your message across to the teeming multitudes of JW’s that descend upon the summer conventions. Unfortunately, this biblical method has been so often abused by well-meaning yet misguided Christians that it has fallen into disfavor with much of our society, a tragedy of epic proportions.
Without going into too much detail, here are some helpful tips for effective preaching:
Use amplification to be effectively heard. These crowds are often counted in the thousands, requiring the need to speak loudly to have any hope of being heard in an often noisy, constantly moving crowd. Raising your voice to be heard can work, but you will be seen by many as “shouting” at them, an instant turn-off. Reasonably amplified speech without “blasting” the crowds with excessive decibel levels requires wisdom and experience.
Your messages should be short and to the point; remember, you are not behind the pulpit with all the benefits that entails. Though you may have a captive audience if the people are having their lunches and sitting around for 20 minutes or more, this is often not the case. Usually, the crowds are constantly moving, requiring that you pack one main thought into 30 seconds or less as they pass you by. Perhaps you only have time to share one particular scripture and a few words of commentary before the crowd passes you by and the next set of people come into your zone.
I like to have a short “loop” of a tightly packed message that I repeat over and over again as the crowds pass by. Since they are constantly moving, you need to reach each passing group of people with the same message because they don’t stick around long enough to hear a three point, 45 minute sermon. Know your audience and plan accordingly!
Remember 2 Timothy 2:24-26: “And the Lord’s bondservant must not be quarrelsome, but be kind to all, able to teach, patient when wronged, with gentleness correcting those who in opposition, if perhaps God will grant them repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth, that they will come to their senses, having escaped the snare of the devil, being held captive by him to do his will.”
The old saying, “Honey catches more flies than vinegar” has application in open-air preaching. Remember, preachers must overcome severe stereotyping that automatically puts us at a disadvantage to our potential audience. Don’t feed into that bias by proving it correct by rude and obnoxious behavior.
Jehovah’s Witnesses will not accept tracts or any other non-JW literature from your hand, no matter how gently and respectfully you offer it to them. This is yet another example of their blatant hypocrisy, but this is not the place to delve into this aspect of this non-Christian cult. I point this fact out so you don’t waste your time in what will prove to be a fruitless attempt.
But saying this, I have had great success in “planting” tracts around the areas where I know the JW’s will eventually sit or stand when they break for lunch and gather in their large groups outside.
This is where an example of good planning is crucial to the success of your mission. Since I have been ministering to JW’s in the same area for over two decades in Tucson, I am familiar with their routines: when they break for lunch, how long these breaks are, where they will sit and stand, and most importantly, the strategic spots and time of actually planting the tracts.
Timing is critical in this idea, because not only do I know the JW’s schedule, but they know mine. After all, we have been dealing with each other for over twenty years, so even enemies can’t help but get to know one another during this long stretch of time.
If I plant the tracts too soon before the lunch break, they might send out their scouts to pick the literature up, defeating my hard work. What I have found works best is to work in a “planting team” and blanket the area within several minutes of the lunch break. This way, there is no time for the JW’s to pick up all the literature because it is too close to the chaos of the thousands of JW’s all leaving for lunch at the same time.
Planting tracts can be a mixed bag of success. Some weekends most of the tracts are picked up by the various JW’s who sit down in the spot where we’ve placed the tracts and/or CD’s. (A Christian donated CD’s of the movie, Witnesses of Jehovah, and I have placed this CD underneath the gospel tracts. Many have been taken!) Some weekends, few are picked up; one never knows. But again, we are planting seeds, and the most important aspect of seed planting is simply planting the seeds in the right place to be picked up.
I always place a small rock or rocks on top of the tracts/CD’s to keep them from blowing away in the wind. One year the police came by and gave me some nonsense that I was littering, a common tactic with police that are not schooled in first amendment law. Placing small rocks on top of your packet will not only prevent them from blowing away, but shows the police that your intention is not to litter.
At the end of the lunch break when all the JW’s return inside to their indoctrination sessions, I go back and pick up all the tracts that are left. We leave at the end of the lunch break and, though we could leave the tracts, I’m assuming most of them will not be picked up because the JW’s are only intent on getting to their cars and leaving the convention center. They are not sitting around for two hours or so like they are during the lunch break; leaving the tracts would not only be a waste of the literature but could become an issue of the police making a point of littering.
Best practice, I believe, is never, if at all possible, to allow any open door of criticism to be made against us during these conventions. This means we leave the place just as we found it, clean and tidy. It makes for a better witness.
These are just a few, tried and true methods for effectively reaching JW’s at the summer conventions. There are many other methods one can use limited only by one’s imagination. Some people have dressed up like JW’s and attended the conventions, sneaking literature into the bathrooms to leave for those who need to use the facilities. I’ve never tried this but I’m sure it is effective.
I always wear a chest-mounted GoPro when I am out on my evangelistic outreaches. If you don’t have one, keeping your cellphone in a front shirt pocket or in a small holder on your chest area with the camera facing toward the people, continually recording, is a wise idea. Why? Several reasons.
First and foremost is you now how a video recording, a trail of evidence, if something goes awry. Say you get into an altercation with a particularly violent, hot-headed JW (see video below). They accuse you of some “incitement” to violence and call the police. The problem is this if you do not have a camera recording the entire event: JW’s will often lie and say you did things you never did or claim you said things that you never said.
Many times I have gone by myself to these conventions. This is not my preference, but it happens. And what will the police decide if a false accusation is made against me and there are a handful of JW’s all lying that I did or said something that never happened? Who are they going to believe? Probably not you, especially if you are vastly outnumbered, which is why it is a must that you plan of videoing every second you are out in the “field of souls.”
Also, and this is more of a reason to continually video, is in case of violence happening (and it does happen), you need video evidence of what actually happened. Nothing more frustrating for a court of law to have to decide the merits of a case based on “he said/she said” testimony.
Whenever I see some JW beginning to show signs of violence or anger towards me, I point to my camera and alert them to the fact they are being recorded. While this is no guarantee this will stop their violent behavior, as my video shows, often the awareness of the fact they are being recorded is enough to cool their jets.
All this to say: develop a system of video recording every moment you are “witnessing to the Witnesses.” It is a rule for me that I have steadfastly followed for years and feel it is one of the best decisions I have made.
My new video on the 2019 summer conventions, titled, “Love Never Fails!”, is up. I want to further probe into this controversial subject and make additional points.
First, I define “shunning” in my video as a separate and totally different spiritual discipline, or punishment, as practiced in the New Testament; it is found in 1 Corinthians chapter 5.
But the shunning that JW’s do, though perhaps biblical in some aspects, take this drastic spiritual correction too far and use it against family members, friends, and neighbors that begin to disagree with doctrinal issues as codified by the Governing Body (GB). When this happens, JW’s use shunning in an unbiblical, cruel manner that is sinful and wicked.
For example, in matters of conscience, where a JW disagrees with the GB, this disagreement can, and is used, as a reason for that individual to be shunned. Take the non-biblical issue of life-saving blood transfusions as one example, which I consider to be a “matter of conscience.” If a JW parent decides to go against the “no blood” belief of the GB and allows their dying son or daughter to receive a blood transfusion that ends up saving his or her life, that parent will probably be shunned and even kicked out of the congregation if it is brought to the attention of the elders.
I’m not writing this post to go deep into debating the fine theological points of blood transfusions or whether or not such a thing is even discussed in the Bible (it is not); this is not the point of this article. What I’m saying is that issues not clearly spoken about in the Bible as sin—adultery, theft, fornication, lying, etc.—are “matters of conscience” and “shunning” someone because they happen to have a contrary opinion to these matters than what the GB does is wrong.
Many JW’s shun family members because those family members are no longer walking in “the truth.” And “the truth,” as defined by JW’s, are any and all teachings, including matters of conscience, that are defined by the GB as being biblical. This is when error and gross sin creep into JW’s thinking as it applies to shunning others.
Without going into nitpicking detail, here is where biblical shunning should be used against someone: if an individual who identifies as a follower of Christ and has committed themselves to being a disciple of Jesus begins to knowingly engage in and practices a sinful lifestyle (say, fornicating with his/her girlfriend), and after being warned three times to cease from that sinful behavior yet refuses to repent, that person should be shunned.
Note the person’s behavior must be a known sin that is being willfully, continually and knowingly engaged in with a defiant attitude and not a matter of conscience.
A matter of conscience would be, for example, your son or daughter wants to join the military, maybe in a non-combat role like a medic, mechanic or cook. Should he be shunned because of this choice? Of course not.
Propaganda is defined as “information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.”
Wikipedia has enlightening information how the Nazi’s effectively used propaganda to brainwash the minds of the German people to embrace Nazism:
“The propaganda used by the German Nazi Party in the years leading up to and during Adolf Hitler’s leadership of Germany (1933–1945) was a crucial instrument for acquiring and maintaining power, and for the implementation of Nazi policies…”
The public school system is one of the main tools for leftists by which America’s youth is systematically being brainwashed to accept anti-American ideologies. This article is the latest example of how LGBTQ fascist tyranny is being force fed down the throats of the unsuspecting.
This is government sanctioned propaganda, American styled. Setting the course for the complete, total, and absolute brainwashing of the youth in America. Few in this country understand the very late hour we find ourselves at in this wicked, perverse country known as “America.”
I just watched a portion of this moving worship song performed by Hillsong:
Look at all the people gathered together in worship and praise to our heavenly, exalted King! It is awesome and inspiring.
But why are Christians being defeated left and right in the culture wars? Why, with our vastly superior numbers, are we losing ground at an astonishingly furious rate? Why are our enemies, infinitesimally small in comparison, soundly beating us at every turn?
As I watch this worship video and see the thousands upon thousands gathered in praise, I wonder, “Where are they when it comes to fighting the gross injustice of abortion? Why are few abortion clinics around the world where Christians are in the majority of the population have few—if any—Christians standing in front of them trying to save innocent lives?”
Or how about the relatively new unspeakable abomination of the Drag Queen Story Hour’s where homosexual drag performers are performing for children as young as two years old? Why are the LGBTQ activists who put on these perversions always outnumbering the Christians who are bold and loving enough to confront them? Why are so very few of our enemies able to ride roughshod over our liberties and mock our faith and now hold us captive to their satanic ideologies?
To me, the answer is obvious, but very few agree with what I consider to be the obvious: God is against His people. He is judging us for our sin and apostasy, our backslidden state, our love and compromising with the world and seeking to make friends with His enemies.
I fear the Lord and do not ever want to be presumptuous in claiming He is acting a certain way when, in fact, He may be acting in the exact opposite. I write this to say that these views of mine are my opinions as I see things. But saying this, I believe I have a firm scriptural basis for believing as I do; without such a basis, who even cares what our opinions are? Only those opinions that align with our King should be given serious consideration; all others are simply not worth considering due to the brevity of our life on this planet: we can’t wast time on foolish speculations.
My scriptural basis for believing that God is against His people derives from a careful reading of Deuteronomy chapter 28. It is worth studying and meditating upon for days, weeks and even months. And if you read and mediate upon this chapter, you will never believe that America is being blessed by God but rather is in the very midst of His awful, terrifying judgment. And it is only becoming progressively worse as each day passes.
Certainly we are still enjoying the fruits of God’s blessings that has been abundantly poured down upon America for centuries. We still have plenty to eat and drink, more money than we can wisely spend, palatial and beautifully decorated and comfortable homes to live in, reliable transportation to take us wherever we want or need to go, etc. One cannot say that we are suffering like, for example, those unfortunates in Somalia.
But no rational observer can fail to see that this perpetual gravy train is coming to an end. Christians are losing freedoms at an astonishing rate. We will soon lose the freedom of free speech and even now, have to carefully watch what we say unless we “misgender” someone and face lawsuits and possible jail time. Just look at what is happening in Canada with the death of free speech and you will see where America is headed.
The bell is tolling for American Christians. Our enemies have been plotting our ruin, seeking to silence us for decades, and wish to dismantle and destroy our influence in the culture. And they have made astonishing progress and now smell “blood in the water”: their soon conquest over us is within their grasp and they are going “all in” to complete their complete subjugation of our influence in society. They will soon force us to bow before them and recognize them as our new masters and lords.
If what I am saying is only half true, can this possibly mean that “God is for us”? Can we say that God intends to bring us a “revival” to suddenly make things right and restore what we have already lost?
I think it is long past time that Christians wake up and smell the coffee. The signs of our judgment and impending doom are all around us, screaming for us to take notice.
Americans—particularly Christians—have a problem: for the most part, we tolerate everything and stand for nothing. There is no evil, no matter how extreme, that “Christian America” will stand in opposition to.
Take two of the latest acts of sheer evil that has washed over this country: Drag Queen Story Hour and Democrats in New York legalizing late-term abortions. Both of these abominations target the most innocent, precious and defenseless of all life on the planet: young children.
You must read this article and watch the video attached to it in order to understand what I mean.
Here is a Virginia House delegate openly advocating for the murder of infants all the way up to birth. We would not even treat pet dogs in this barbaric, inhumane and cruel fashion but would rise up and burn the place down where the dogs were being euthanized.
The government of the United States no longer represents the cherished values of the majority of its citizens and has not done so for generations. Two cases in point: the legalization of abortion in 1973 and the recent legalization of so-called “same-sex marriage.” Both of these abominable rulings were forced down the throats of the majority of Americans against their will by the unelected, unaccountable ruling class: the majority of the members of the United States Supreme Court who exercise complete and total dominion over the USA. They are our rulers—our Kings and despots—and no longer “we the people.”
Both the federal and state governments have become destructive to our “life, liberty and pursuit of happiness” and have done so for generations. Every day we lose more freedoms and our cherished “unalienable rights.” Each day the chains of oppression and slavery tighten their grip around our throats; soon, we will become so powerless we will never be able to break free.
There is one solution, given to us by our Founding Fathers in the Declaration of Independence: abolishing the government. Here is our marching orders, labeled a “right” and a “duty” by our godly ancestors:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”
Notice the careful wording: “…it is the right of the People to alter or abolish it…”
Later, the admonition becomes stronger: “it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government…”
This can only be accomplished by a second Civil War that will dwarf in every possible way our first Civil War. But the window for doing this is rapidly closing because more and more Americans are so brainwashed by political correctness that our thinking is becoming conformed to the very evil that is ensnaring us. Soon, the very men that can save our country by a violent overthrow will become so neutered that all of us will be led like lambs into the slaughterhouse, precisely like what happened to the Jews in WW2 in places like Auschwitz.
I have studied how a relatively few soldiers in concentration camps can control tens of thousands of prisoners in absolute subjugation, even when those prisoners, if acting in concert together, could easily storm these soldiers and overtake them.
Certainly there would be great loss of life on the part of the prisoners. But with their vastly superior numbers, they would prevail if they had the will and the leadership to “go for broke.”
And why not? What is more honorable, to die a grisly, painful and ignoble death by being pushed into a cyanide laced shower, or die like freemen fighting for liberty? Total annihilation is inevitable in the former, but there is hope for freedom and dignity in the latter.
Jesus commended the Church in Ephesus when He said, “I know that you cannot tolerate wicked people…” (Rev. 2:2(b) NIV) but He rebuked the Church in Thyatira when He said, “Nevertheless, I have this against you: “You tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophet…” (Rev. 2:20(a))
In America, the Body of Christ falls all over themselves in tolerating evil people. This manifests itself in the greatest of diabolical extremes when pro-life Christians actually seek to minister to abortion doctors and abortion clinic workers and buy them flowers or gifts in the hope that their “grace filled approach” will cause these baby murderers to somehow “see the light” and “come to Jesus.”
My reply? Try your “grace filled approach” with the concentration camp guards in Nazi Germany and see how far that will get you.
Christians in America are brainwashed by the false gospel of “cheap grace” and “sloppy agape.” Again, there is no evil in America that Christians will not tolerate and seek to “forgive.” None. Not one single act of evil.
And I’m sorry to say that even when the forces of evil that run this country will one day murder our families in the cruelest of fashions, when they throw babies up in the air and catch them on pitchforks like they did in Nazi Germany, deluded, brainwashed Christians will fall down on their knees before the murderers of their own flesh and blood and cry out, “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do!”
A little known fact concerning Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW’s) is they are liars. Truth is neither honored nor valued in this false religious group.
My latest Youtube video proves this:
Beginning at timestamp 2:35, there is a JW who claims to be from the “Sheriff’s office.” Before I accidentally deleted this video (read here), I had several comments from various people who questioned whether or not a JW could be a member of law enforcement and carry a gun. The consensus was that they could not.
At timestamp 5:35, you can clearly read his name on his name tag: George Liebman from the “Kyrene Congregation” in Phoenix, AZ. Their phone number is (480) 961-3445.
George appears to be inferring he is a deputy Sheriff, wouldn’t you say? That is certainly the impression I get, further confirmed at 2:54 when he talks about “getting back up here and we can have you arrested.” And when he tells me at 5:35 that he would have “loved to lock me up,” that leaves no question of his purported authority as a member of law enforcement.
On July 31, 2014, I called the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office in Phoenix and asked them if a “George Liebman” worked there. No such person was listed, either under that spelling or under “Lieberman.” Nothing.
It appears that George was lying, behavior that I have previously run into dealing with JW’s.
In reviewing the video, I ask George, “Where’s your badge? (2:31)” My question appears to take him by surprise and he replies, “I don’t have it with me; I don’t bring it.” I’m no Sheriff’s deputy nor a member of law enforcement, but I was under the impression that an off-duty officer is required to carry both his gun and his badge at all times. I could be wrong, but that’s the impression I have.
George clearly does not know what he is talking about in this short conversation. At all times in this video, I was on public property; any legitimate law enforcement officer should know this. When George first spoke with me, I was outside the convention center, underneath the expansive, protective overhang. Here, my constitutional rights to simply be walking around and videoing people is even more clear than when I was inside doing the same thing.
Again, a real police officer would have known this. There may have been some confusion even among experienced officers of my constitutional right to be videoing inside the building (though well-trained officers would certainly not be confused even in this setting), but not on the outside of a public building: it is clearly established that members of the public have constitutional rights to video anybody they want outside of tax-payer funded and built public buildings like convention centers. This is what we call a “no brainer.”
Also, what law enforcement professional would ever say something so unprofessional as “I’d just love to lock you up”? (5:34) All the evidence points to the fact that ole’ George Liebman was lying through his JW teeth.
My most popular Jehovah’s Witness video is back on Youtube. Here it is:
This video had almost 60,000 views and, if memory serves me correctly, hundreds of comments before disaster struck: I accidentally deleted it. I was fiddling around with the settings on my Youtube account, trying to tweak the video and make it better, when, all of a sudden, it was gone!
I was stunned. To this day, I still can’t figure out what I did and how I deleted it, but the damage was done…it was gone. Incredibly, Youtube does not have a “revert” function that will allow you to “get back” a video you accidentally delete; once you delete a video, it is gone and gone forever. They need to change that because I’m sure I’m not the only one that had done this.
What’s worse, when I looked on one of my external hard drives where I store my JW videos as backups, the finalized Youtube version I had uploaded was nowhere to be found. Another disaster!
Yes, I had the raw, unedited footage, praise God, but I spent hours upon hours in putting the finalized version that you saw on Youtube together, and that finalized version was gone.
I did not have the stomach nor desire to tackle such a huge task again so soon, and I pushed it to the back of my mind. I always thought I would try and redo it, but, life goes on…
Then, a couple of weeks ago, someone left a comment on another of my JW videos asking me where this video was. He said he remembered it and wanted to watch it again, but could not find it. Like many people, he thought it was entertaining how insane and ridiculous so many of those JW thugs acted. He mentioned their faces, how funny their expressions were.
I explained to him that I deleted it, but his positive comment spurred me forward to undertake the herculean task of redoing the video. Finally, after hours and hours of more work, I finished the task, believing this second version is better than the first.
I might be wrong and loathe being presumptuous against God’s nature, intentions and will. If I’m wrong, and those who argue that God loves America and this is why Americans continue being “blessed beyond measure” are correct, I don’t want to be known as a false teacher.
The reasons why I believe that America is under the wrath of God could fill a 400 page book without exhausting my evidence; I would just be “getting going,” so to speak.
One of the reasons I believe America is under the wrath of God is because this country is going backwards instead of forwards in many areas.
For example—and this might seem trivial, but I believe it speaks volumes and helps lay a foundation for my premise—the inane fixation that government has on outlawing certain restaurant items they consider harmful to the environment…like plastic drinking straws. Yes, drinking straws, the almost necessary items we all use to enjoy drinks.
You might be laughing, shaking your head and muttering, “The guy writing this post needs to get a hobby; he has far too much time on his hands.” Please read on, but first read this article.
There may be legitimate reasons why the government wishes to outlaw the common plastic drinking straw. No doubt they clog up landfills and are responsible for untold amounts of money damages due to the havoc they wreck on plumbing pipes when they are carelessly flushed down toilets. I understand this.
But why target an item that all of us use and enjoy countless number of times every single day? An argument can be made that these straws are almost essential to drinking cups filled with soft drinks (another target of government’s wrath, but this is for another post), especially if those cups are filled with ice cubes. How else is someone able to easily drink out of such a cup without picking it up and throwing your head back with the very real risk of accidentally choking on a piece of ice?
With this latest government law forcing fast food places and other restaurants to get rid of their straws, customers are being penalized and our dining experience is being lessened, becoming more of an irritant than a pleasure.
This is a problem with multiple lines of abuse streaming into the situation, all adding up to a disaster in the making. To mention one: we all understand and are sympathetic to an individual with an actual need for a service animal, like a blind person (a real blind person and not simply one who has problems seeing) who has a trained, seeing-eye dog. Nobody would complain about this person needing to have this animal on the plane.
But what always happens in cases like these, when the government steps in and begins to mandate laws, adding to the list of “service animals”? Soon, we have new categories—emotional support animals, for example—that includes all kinds of pets: fish, birds, cats, ducks, hamsters, ferrets, etc.
Then, human nature being what it is—, lawless, selfish and self-centered to the core—pet owners who worship their animals see they can now travel with their pets on airplanes for free…as long as their pets are “emotional support animals.” And any number of websites will provide you all the necessary documentation for the required “fee.”
But no one likes your pet as much as you do. You may think that chihuahua you are holding on your lap is the cutest, most lovable thing in the universe, but I don’t. And I don’t want to sit next to a smelly, defecating, urinating, salivating, barking, shedding animal next to me for the next four hours while I pick out its dog hair out of my Coke.
And I shouldn’t have to, and neither should anyone else. And for almost a hundred years, air travelers never had to worry about this nonsense until a few years ago; now, it is turning the ever increasing stressful air travel industry into an even more stressful and miserable situation.
These two examples are just the tip of the proverbial iceberg proving that we, the people of the United States of America, are going backwards in countless situations than surging forward, evidence to support my assertion that America is under the wrath of God.